T-127 still one of my favorite tanks, but the limited mm now not as special. I don't hope it's going to be the same as with the object 268 v4 where it takes ages to nerf it and then it gets needed to little. Matchmaking is universal, but how flexible it can be, depends on each server because of player numbers. CaptTeddy, I'm not sure if you are being stubborn, or just not reading what he wrote. And they try to not make any promises they can't do anymore. Further more the gun handling is absolutely atrocious - the worst among its peers. Funny though that you only list the strengths and then proceed like there are no downsides to this ship.
Tier 10s or any tier for that matter should never be balanced around fighting lower tiers. General improvement of the penetration value and gun handling parameters. Not discounting what you stated of course, but lots of people attribute burnout to other things. A few years ago they change the mechanic of credit and xp. Then there's others that are pretty good, but are not better, they perform the same as their same tier counter-parts, if not slightly more better, but with no major difference in stats. This is the second time it has been available for money in the store, right? It doesn't have unique matchmaking.
And this tank with them mm list mmowg. Given that the alternative is being bottom tier, single-tier is a godsend! Overall improvement of the technical characteristics. As an owner of almost all pref mm tanks in the game, I would only settle for a cash refund, a swap for a t10 reward tank because any trade in for the tanks will be pointless for me as I already have all the prem 8s I want. Goal: improve the same thing happens when forming platoons. I stopped giving you money in May Victor the wife and kids can eat again and I serve notice that the bank of Lowfat is closed until further notice.
The problem is in their new mm system. For what it's worth, yes, the top ships when looked at overall are Gremy, Fujin, and Kami R. Murmansk, Gremyashy, Nikolai, Belfast, Kamikakze R, Missouri, Tirpitz, Scharnhorst, Molotov, Kutozov, Blyskawica. Let me badly, the new tank review guide. Scott richmond says th lines from mid tiers they just leave wn out. Only three top world of their tier 9. And what ship literally ran roughshod over everything last time there was a tier 7 ranked? Such vehicles benefit from all of the advantages of regular premium tanks, except the increased credit income.
Good luck Wargaming, even I dont know how to solve this. So for example, doesn't cost 25x as much as. All the tanks you compare it to in the second example meet tier Xs too and are worse in some other aspects, like armor. The game certainly isn't pay to win. Ratings for Ranked Battles will be calculated immediately after the battle. This is an interesting topic, but I think there are some subtleties at play that only a few responders have alluded to.
And fully upgraded vehicles of tanks. This algorithm creates more even team composition overall. If the queue time is taking too long, then the matchmaking system will adapt so that players can get into battle more quickly. Amway921: the kv-5 has battle and find a 3vs3 game, against many such. Every t6 cruiser got powercreeped by the Spee. This rule may not apply, when the server is low populated. However DezGamez held a survey last week and more than 90% of those who took part would be more than happy to wait another minute to get a better balance in matchmaking.
I can see how it would be a good thing for a more fluid matchmaker but at the same time I think many of the new premium tanks that have been recently introduced on pc are pushing that pay-to-win boundary or at the very least are on par with their tech tree counterparts. Wargaming doesn't like this at all and the idea is practically scrapped. You ignore the fact that there are 30 tanks in a game. Wot tanks with special matchmaking. The Kamikaze for example, hits this category. Its still a nice premium to play from time to time as a change up, because it is different, but not better than anything else. It used to be effective but with so many new tanks it became paper.
This means they have to deal with tanks that can easily overpower them. Like some tanks td matchmaking for premium legacy, 2013 preferential matchmaking, not. Hull is still squishy against anything with 200mm of penetration. This is sometimes done on purpose. They do it quite frequently in World of Warships as well.
Thing is, when shooting at angled armor the penetration will decrease — this is a physics relationship. The only thing that is actually hard to deal with is the is3 and defender. See this for more details on actual map distribution in random battles. The majority of their Premiums exist as a stop-gap, a half upgraded tank, that's better than it's stock counterpart, but worse than it's fully upgraded counterpart. Two levels battles: This template manages to create teams with :5 Tanks at the top top tiers , and the rest at the bottom, featuring vehicles equal in tier. I mean, look at the outrage it has caused. Iwaki Alpha is the death pickle, a ship born and made for Alpha Testers as their Alpha Reward ship.
Just don't implement it and everybody will calm down. Exactly as premium tanks should be. The community had a crazy negative reaction. This setup comes in various iterations, but the same ratio still applies, keeping the bottom tier players as the majority on both sides. View range, for height and would rebalance.