What was abraham lincoln house divided speech about. Analysis of Abraham Lincoln's House Divided Speech (400 Words) 2022-12-20
What was abraham lincoln house divided speech about Rating:
5,9/10
1682
reviews
Abraham Lincoln's "House Divided" speech was a speech he delivered at the Illinois Republican Convention on June 16, 1858. In this speech, Lincoln addressed the issue of slavery and its potential expansion into the western territories. He argued that the country was deeply divided over the issue of slavery and that it was time for the nation to confront this divide head-on.
At the time of Lincoln's speech, the United States was in the midst of a political crisis known as the "Bleeding Kansas" conflict. This conflict arose because the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 had opened up the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to the possibility of becoming slave states. This act effectively nullified the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in these territories.
Lincoln argued that the Kansas-Nebraska Act was a major threat to the nation and that it had the potential to spread slavery into the western territories. He argued that this expansion of slavery would be a grave injustice and would threaten the very foundations of the nation. He called on the people of Illinois to stand up against the expansion of slavery and to work towards a future where all men were free and equal.
Lincoln's "House Divided" speech was a powerful and influential statement that helped to galvanize the anti-slavery movement in the United States. It also helped to establish Lincoln as a leading voice in the fight against slavery and set the stage for his eventual election as President of the United States.
In conclusion, Abraham Lincoln's "House Divided" speech was a powerful and influential statement that addressed the issue of slavery and its potential expansion into the western territories. It helped to galvanize the anti-slavery movement and set the stage for Lincoln's eventual election as President of the United States.
Lincoln's House Divided Speech
The negroe's name was "Dred Scott," which name now designates the decision finally made in the case. It was the 'Bleeding of Kansas' that sparked the interest for Abraham Lincoln to reenter the political scene. Did Lincoln ever say Divided We Stand? And why the hasty after indorsement of the decision by the President and others? Then, in a few days, came the decision. His avowed mission is impressing the "public heart" to care nothing about it. But clearly, he is not now with us-he does not pretend to be-he does not promise to ever be.
Analysis of Abraham Lincoln's House Divided Speech (400 Words)
He introduced measures that resulted in the abolition of slavery, issuing his Emancipation Proclamation in 1863 and promoting the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. His late joint struggle with the Republicans, against the Lecompton Constitution, involves nothing of the original Nebraska doctrine. Have we no tendency to the latter condition? Two years ago the Republicans of the nation mustered over thirteen hundred thousand strong. In the King James Version, the quote is found in Matthew, 12:25: And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand. That principle, is the only shred left of his original Nebraska doctrine.
Our cause, then, must be intrusted to, and conducted by its own undoubted friends—those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in the work—who do care for the result. The lives of hundreds of thousands of Soviet soldiers would have been spared. Let this be granted. The pressure was coming because Douglas was in the midst of a bitter feud with President James Buchanan, the more openly pro-slavery leader of his national party. Four days later, commenced the struggle which ended in repealing that Congressional prohibition.
The people were to be left "perfectly free," "subject only to the Constitution. The indorsement, however, fell short of a clear popular majority by nearly four hundred thousand votes, and so, perhaps, was not overwhelmingly reliable and satisfactory. There are those who denounce us openly to their own friends, and yet whisper us softly, that Senator Douglas is the aptest instrument there is, with which to effect that object. This point is made in order that individual men may fill up the Territories with slaves, without danger of losing them as property, and thus to enhance the chances of permanency to the institution through all the future. These things look like the cautious patting and petting of a spirited horse, preparatory to mounting him, when it is dreaded that he may give the rider a fall. Whenever, if ever, he and we can come together on principle so that our great cause may have assistance from his great ability, I hope to have interposed no adventitious obstacle.
Can he possibly show that it is less a sacred right to buy them where they can be bought cheapest? In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. The Future of Freedom Foundation. Auxiliary to all this, and working hand in hand with it, the Nebraska doctrine, or what is left of it, is to educate and mould public opinion, at least Northern public opinion, to not care whether slavery is voted down or voted up. The Presidential inauguration came, and still no decision of the court; but the incoming President in his inaugural address, fervently exhorted the people to abide by the forthcoming decision, whatever it might be. California's population exploded, allowing speculators to skip the territorial phase and directly apply for statehood. That was the second point gained. Douglas Lincoln concluded his speech with a call to action, often referred to as the 'living dog' section.
In effect, the Compromise of 1850 overturned the Missouri Compromise. What did Abraham Lincoln mean when he said a house divided against itself Cannot stand? It should not be overlooked that, by the Nebraska bill, the people of a State as well as Territory, were to be left " perfectly free" " subject only to the Constitution. This point is made, not to be pressed immediately; but, if acquiesced in for a while, and apparently indorsed by the people at an election, then to sustain the logical conclusion that what Dred Scott's master might lawfully do with Dred Scott, in the free State of Illinois, every other master may lawfully do with any other one, or one thousand slaves, in Illinois, or in any other free State. They wish us to infer all, from the facts, that he now has a little quarrel with the present head of the dynasty; and that he has regularly voted with us, on a single point, upon which, he and we, have never differed. Does Douglas believe an effort to revive that trade is approaching? The negro's name was "Dred Scott," which name now designates the decision finally made in the case. To pacify the North, the compromise allowed for the admission of California as a free state, and to pacify the South, it created a stronger fugitive slave law.
It is important to understand that the Civil War of 1861-1865 did not bring about the abolition of slavery in the South de facto, but only de jure. There were 50 copies printed - this is 38. They wish us to infer all, from the facts, that he now has a little quarrel with the present head of the dynasty; and that he has regularly voted with us, on a single point, upon which, he and we, have never differed. The result is not doubtful. There are those who denounce us openly to their own friends, and yet whisper us softly, that Senator Douglas is the aptest instrument there is with which to effect that object.
Lincoln’s ‘House Divided’ speech teaches important lessons about today's political polarization
Such a decision is all that slavery now lacks of being alike lawful in all the States. Why even a Senator's individual opinion withheld, till after the Presidential election? Today, the American Civil War of 1861—1865 is being commonly regarded as the event that had brought about the liberation of African-Americans from slavery, which is why the majority of Americans consider this war as such that was dialectically predestined to occur — after all, no sober-minded person would argue in favor of slavery. Debates raged as Congressmen heatedly argued over slavery in the territories. But "a living dog is better than a dead lion. His avowed mission is impressing the "public heart" to care nothing about it. Let any one who doubts, carefully contemplate that now almost complete legal combination--piece of machinery so to speak--compounded of the Nebraska doctrine, and the Dred Scott decision. They remind us that he is a great man, and that the largest of us are very small ones.
