What is considered a cogent argument. What is a cogent argument? 2022-12-13
What is considered a cogent argument Rating:
5,2/10
174
reviews
A cogent argument is a type of argument that is clear, logical, and well-reasoned. It is based on evidence and presents a strong case for a particular position or viewpoint. A cogent argument is designed to persuade the reader or listener to accept a particular conclusion or course of action.
There are several key elements that are essential to a cogent argument. First and foremost, it must be based on sound evidence. This means that the argument must be supported by reliable and credible sources, such as scientific studies, expert testimony, or historical documents. Without strong evidence, the argument will lack credibility and will not be able to persuade the audience.
In addition to being based on evidence, a cogent argument must also be logical and well-reasoned. This means that the argument must be structured in a clear and logical manner, with each point building upon the previous one in a way that leads to a logical conclusion. The argument should also consider and address any counterarguments or opposing viewpoints, and provide a strong rebuttal to these points.
Another important aspect of a cogent argument is that it should be presented in a clear and concise manner. The argument should be easy to understand and should not be unnecessarily complex or convoluted. It should be presented in a way that is accessible to the audience, regardless of their level of knowledge or expertise on the topic.
Finally, a cogent argument should be persuasive. It should be able to convince the reader or listener to accept the conclusion or take the recommended course of action. This requires the argument to be well-supported and logical, as well as being presented in a clear and convincing manner.
In summary, a cogent argument is a clear, logical, and well-reasoned argument that is based on evidence and is designed to persuade the reader or listener to accept a particular conclusion or course of action. It is an essential tool in many fields, including academia, politics, and business, as it allows individuals to effectively communicate their ideas and persuade others to adopt their viewpoint.
Validity, Soundness, and Cogency
Yes, the premises of a cogent argument are always true because, by definition, a cogent argument is a strong argument. C Therefore 40% of people who take the drug will go blind. Furthermore, a cogent argument is strong, so the premises, if they were true, would succeed in providing probable support for the conclusion. Are there enough students in the course to justify using them as a representative group for students in general? For instance, if it turns out that Tweety is an ostrich, then the premises are true but the conclusion is false. All valid arguments have all true premises and true conclusions.
You can think of validity as a truth pump: Put true premises into a valid argument, and out comes a true conclusion. Are the premises of a cogent argument always true? If the student body numbers in the tens of thousands, I might want to ask a few more before assuming that the opinions of a few mirror those of the many. I could also make the following observation: P2 I like Sex and the City and Twilight. The following arguments are weak. The professor's explanation of post-modernism was quite cogent. We could also make an alternate conclusion based on the same argument above: C David probably also knows Donna.
All the three premises are true and augur well with the conclusion statement. For example, Shep Smith of Fox News said he saw Barack Obama walk on water. All birds are fish. B: appropriate, germane, and compelling analysis 2: the ability to persuade or restrict compelling forces: a cogent argument 3: a sound reasoning process or course: a coed class with only two students enrolled 4: an accurate understanding of something 5: a good explanation or justification: a cogent account of events 6: a fair judgment 7: a correct decision 8: a useful tool 9: a proper application 10: a convincing demonstration Cogent evidence is clear and consistent, easily understood and accepted by the audience, which leads them to believe it. For instance, if it turns out that Tweety is an ostrich, then the premises are true but the conclusion is false. It is also possible to temper our conclusion with other similar qualifying words.
Determination of a cogent argument Essay [640 Words] GradeMiners
The induction goes a little like this: P1 Donna is friends with Brandon, Kelly, Steve, and Brenda. Back to ' Writer's Web. Cogency: If an argument is strong and all its premises are true, the argument is said to be cogent. If you read something in the newspaper that states that "dogs smell like fish" and then go outside and see someone's dog lying in the street, you know what conclusion to draw: dogs do not smell like fish. Coherence refers to how anything, such as an argument or a portion of an argument , "hangs together. Join over 400,000 lifelong learners today! P2 Socrates was found guilty of homicide last year in Canada.
For instance, a drug addict student can score As while a Christian one scores Ds, these grades do not absolutely reflect the students personal values at all. The first argument displays good reasoning and the second demonstrates fallacious reasoning. Inductively valid arguments are the opposite. Relevance is the relation of the various premises to the conclusion premise, it all the premises are true then it is said to be relevant to the conclusion Audi 251. An cogent inductive argument is one that is both strong and has true premises.
Take for example a drug study. Cogency thus depends on the premises, if all the premises are true, then the conclusion will be probably construed to be true, the use of the word probably makes it open for any argument to be considered. We can assume that anyone enrolled in a logic course is more likely to see it as valuable than any random student. Here we can identify the qualities that Bob and Dick have in common as symptoms of hipsterism. And yet it might be that both premises are true and the conclusion is false. Statistical Syllogism Where in an inductive generalization we saw statement expressing a statistic applied to a more general group, we can also use statistics to go from the general to the particular.
Is it true that an argument cannot be both inductive and cogent?
What is the example of cogent argument? If A happens, then B happens too. For example, this is a reasonably strong inductive argument: Today, John said he likes Romona. What is the difference between a cogent argument and an inductive argument? The use of the ARG is useful in making deductive or inductive reasoning that is essential in the critical and creative thinking Audi 285. Falsely inferring that it is raining because the ground is wet is known as affirming the consequent. But inductive arguments can be more or less strong. Most birds can fly. There are definitely more certain and more uncertain cases.
The various clues in the murder case are among the facts we want explained. The ground is wet. Both soundness and cogency are concerned with truth. Is it unethical to lie in order to donate blood? Every valid argument is a sound argument. Relevance is the relation of the various premises to the conclusion premise, it all the premises are true then it is said to be relevant to the conclusion Audi 251. There are certain things I need to take into account in judging the quality of this argument. An important decision writers must make in their papers is when to take a premise as accepted or whether it needs support from outside research.
P2 Heroin also reduces pain and causes drowsiness. You may find it useful to set off your premises with certain phrasings. An uncogent argument is an inductive argument that is either weak or has at least one false premise. A cogent argument is one that the truth of its premise makes the conclusion more likely to be true than false. Is the conclusion of an inductive argument valid? Judgment in this regard is often formed with experience writing and familiarity with the topic.
