Talcott Parsons was a renowned sociologist who made significant contributions to the study of social stratification. In his work, Parsons argued that social stratification, or the unequal distribution of resources and privileges among members of a society, is a fundamental feature of all societies. He believed that social stratification serves as a mechanism for allocating resources and coordinating social behavior, and that it is based on both structural and cultural factors.
According to Parsons, social stratification is characterized by three key features. First, it is a system of inequality that is based on the unequal distribution of resources and privileges among members of a society. This inequality can be based on various factors, such as race, ethnicity, gender, class, and education. Second, social stratification is a dynamic process that is continually shaped by both individual and collective actions. This means that the distribution of resources and privileges is not fixed, but rather it is continually negotiated and re-negotiated through social interaction and conflict. Third, social stratification has a functional aspect, meaning that it serves a purpose within a society. Parsons argued that social stratification serves as a mechanism for allocating resources and coordinating social behavior, and that it is necessary for the smooth functioning of society.
Parsons believed that social stratification is based on both structural and cultural factors. Structural factors refer to the social, economic, and political structures of a society, such as the distribution of wealth and power among different groups. Cultural factors refer to the shared values, beliefs, and norms of a society, which shape the way that people interact with each other and the way that they perceive and evaluate social positions.
Parsons argued that social stratification is maintained through a system of socialization that shapes individuals' attitudes and behaviors in ways that reinforce their social position. For example, he argued that the education system plays a key role in maintaining social stratification by preparing individuals for different roles and positions within society.
Overall, Parsons' work on social stratification has had a significant impact on the field of sociology, and his ideas continue to be influential in the study of inequality and social mobility.
Talcott Parsons: The Social System, and General Action Theory (1952)
Supposedly, Parsons did not take into consideration that social categories and their rankings are subject to change. This goes on as a process. His theory was considered highly conservative, complex, and abstract; and he was seen as Political conservative. Does this mean that structural or macro-level efforts to reduce ethnic discrimination be calib How can we define privilege? The positions are unequal with regard to power, property, evaluation and psychic gratification. It is a hierarchical ordering of people in a society differentiated according to power, privileges and status. This is why, social stratification has been variously defined but the main contention of all the definitions is the differentiation of a given population into hierarchical ranked superposed classes along some dimension of inequality.
How did Talcott Parsons look at social stratification?
A collectivity, when it is considered as a social object, is never constituted by all the action of the participating individual actors; it may, however, be constituted by anything from a specified segment of their actions specific system of roles. Functionalists believe that society is a system that works together in order for it to funtction. Stratification is no means to justify the status quo. Those who spend more time on training and acquiring new skills are compensated with high returns. Class, according to Marx, is a historical category. The local police do not have enough manpower to eliminate this problem so we have taken it upon ourselves to create change.
Social Stratification: Meaning, Nature, Characteristics and Theories of Social Stratification
First being Structural functionalism, next is social conflict, and lastly there is symbolic interaction. Members of a particular group have common identity, like interests, and similar life-style. They say, there is the necessity to distribute prestige according to the importance to society of a social position. Davis and Moore argue that all societies need some mechanism for ensuring effective role allocation and performance. Thus, stratification involves two phenomena, 1 differentiation of individuals or groups where by some individuals or group come to rank higher than other and 2 the ranking of individuals according to some basis of valuation. It is necessary for those who hold most important positions to play their roles must efficiently.