Prompt and utter destruction summary. Prompt & Utter Destruction, by J. Samuel Walker 2022-12-08
Prompt and utter destruction summary
"Prompt and utter destruction" is a phrase that refers to the concept of using military force to completely and swiftly defeat an enemy. This idea has a long history, with examples dating back to ancient civilizations and continuing to the present day.
One of the most well-known examples of prompt and utter destruction is the concept of "shock and awe," a military strategy that involves overwhelming an enemy with a rapid and intense display of force. This strategy was used during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, where the United States and its allies sought to quickly defeat the Iraqi military and overthrow the regime of Saddam Hussein.
While the concept of prompt and utter destruction may seem appealing in the heat of battle, it is not without its critics. Some argue that this approach can lead to unnecessary destruction and loss of civilian life, as well as long-term consequences such as ongoing conflicts and instability in the region.
Additionally, the use of prompt and utter destruction can also have diplomatic and political consequences. For example, the 2003 invasion of Iraq was highly controversial and sparked widespread protests and condemnation from around the world. It also led to a prolonged and costly military occupation, with the United States and its allies facing ongoing resistance and attacks from Iraqi militants.
Despite these criticisms, the concept of prompt and utter destruction remains a controversial and often-used tactic in modern warfare. It is a reminder of the destructive power of military force and the importance of considering the long-term consequences of such actions.
Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary
This is a MUST read for anyone interested in learning more about the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although, whether or not it was necessary, it was most definitely not the morally correct way to end the World War II states President Truman's Decision To Dropping The Atomic Bomb On Japan Beside President Truman motivations which was to end the war, he was still new to this idea of the atomic bombs. Samuel Walker analyzes the reasons behind President Truman's most controversial decision. The author, the historian of the U. In this new edition, Walker takes into account recent scholarship on the topic, including new information on the Japanese decision to surrender. It went right to the heart of debunking the myths of necessity that came afterwards. And yes, the bomb was necessary to save the lives of American troops, perhaps numbering in the several thousands.
Every member of society has an interest in retaining his or her personal reputation and standing. If the Soviets joined, the U. Roosevelt had laid the ground that when the bomb has been made, then it had to be used upon the aggressor, which may appear unethical. They did play an important key factor in starting the cold war, however they launched into the nuclear age at the same time. It included high ranking military officials and top scientist from the Manhattan Project as advisor like Oppenheimer, Fermi, Lawrence, and Arthur Compton. After all, the bombing of civilian targets had been into the American, and Allied, policies as shown by the carpet bombing of Dresden and other German cities.
Prompt And Utter Destruction Analysis
With the mainland invasion, there would be high casualties and an enormous amount of money spent. In his analysis of Truman's decision to use the Atomic bomb on Japan, Walker also looks at how the success of the 'Trinity' test the United States's first test of an Atomic device influenced his behavior at the Potsdam meeting between Truman, Churchill, and Stalin, and how their interaction at this meeting shaped the Potsdam Declaration, which demanded the unconditional surrender of Japan. Was it really needed to end the war earlier? To begin, Truman had won the love and affection of many Americans after his career 7. The United States decision making during World War II can be likened to a jig saw puzzle. He details the machinations that went into making this decision, how it was carried out, and its political ramifications. The author analyzes the reasons behind President Truman's most controversial decision by studying what was known and not known by American leaders at the time including the roles of U.
Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan
Okinawa say , and that if you were to take those rates and aggregate them with respect to the surface area of the main Japanese islands, you could provide a sort of linear forecast to what the total cost might be for the invasion. The alternatives theme of alienation n no where man by kamala markandeya ANTIGONE KEY LITERARY ELEMENTS SETTING This tragedy is set against the background of the Oedipus legend. Samuel Walker, "Prompt and Utter Destruction", p. Since its recent and abrupt cessation, we have only begun to measure the effects of the Cold War on American, Soviet, post-Soviet, and international military strategy, economics, domestic. It was said that hundreds of thousands, upwards to a million, American military causalities were saved by the dropping of the Atomic bombs. It would end the war quickly, especially considering the fact that the Japanese seemed to have no intention of quitting anytime soon. Samuel Walker analyzes the reasons behind President Truman's most controversial decision.
Analysis of Prompt and Utter Destruction Essay
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references p. Another reason was that the United States wanted to get revenge on Japan for the attacks that were made in Pearl Harbor. In this intriguing narrative, Breuer, chronicles MacArthur's long-running covert war that he waged against the Japanese during World War II. Interestingly, Walker also includes data gathered in part from Gallup Polls that show how average Americans felt about the use of the Atomic bomb against Japan. In this case, the argument on the preliminary use of the atomic bomb over Hiroshima and Nagasaki has become clearer as more evidence and documents have surfaced in these past years. Or would that, and Russia declaring war and invading Manchuria have caused the Japanese to surrender without using the bomb? Two days later a second atomic bomb was dropped on the city of Nagasaki increasing the death toll to 120,000.
Prompt And Utter Destruction Book PDF
Did dropping the bombs actually save lives in the end; lives that would have been lost in a full-blown invasion. In addition to the desire to end the war and thus the casualties to the American troops, Truman had other reasons for considering the approval of the atomic attacks. Plus it has a bunch of quotes and facts surrounding the war situation and p Had to read this book for a class in college, but I highly enjoyed it. Walker also provides insights into the role that the use of the Atomic weapons had on the Japanese decision to surrender. In the end, I truly believe the President Truman made the right call when it came to the atomic bomb. So in the light of all the evidence, was the bomb necessary? If so, was it to eliminate the need for an invasion and save hundreds of thousands of lives as claimed mostly after the fact , or to increase our political power in negotiations with Stalin? Samuel Walker In this concise account of why America used atomic bombs against Japan in 1945, J. Had to read this book for a class in college, but I highly enjoyed it.
Prompt & Utter Destruction, by J. Samuel Walker
Mere moments later the city was engulfed in a fireball that rose up into the sky. In this concise account of why America used atomic bombs against Japan in 1945, J. Rising above an often polemical debate, Walker presents an accessible synthesis of previous work and an important, original contribution to our understanding of the events that ushered in the atomic age. Would Japan have capitulated without it almost as early anyway? The Allied naval blockade of Japan left the country and its economy devastated. This careful scholarly monograph, which makes its appearance the morning after the bitter controversy aroused by the 50th anniversary of Hiroshima, is "post-revisionist" in tone and outlook. In this book, Walker does not conclusively declare that the use of the bombs was, or was not, necessary to end the war and save American lives.
Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan by J. Samuel Walker
Delineating what was known and not known by American leaders at the time, Walker evaluates the roles of U. Historic research and past events can only be presented and made conclusive as far as the available evidence allows it. Samuel Walker and published by UNC Press Books which was released on 13 March 2006 with total hardcover pages 161. Walker also examines the role played by Truman's success in getting the Soviet's promise to enter the war in East Asia by invading Manchuria, and how this invasion, once it began, altered the face of the War. As with the decision to use the bombs, their decision to surrender was not as clear cut and easy to define as one would first imagine. It does so without putting another myth in its place: that the decision to hasten the end of the war by using the atomic bomb was anything but a very difficult decision. .