The Stranger is a novel written by Albert Camus in 1942. It tells the story of Meursault, a young man living in Algiers who becomes emotionally detached from the world around him after the death of his mother. The novel is often considered an example of absurdist literature, as it explores themes of absurdity, nihilism, and the human condition.
One example of the absurdity present in The Stranger is Meursault's lack of emotional response to the death of his mother. Despite being the protagonist of the novel, Meursault is unable to feel grief or sadness over his mother's death, and instead spends much of the time after her funeral casually chatting with his neighbors and even going to the beach. This detachment from his emotions is a clear example of the absurdity present in the novel, as it is not a typical or expected response to the loss of a loved one.
Another example of absurdity in The Stranger is Meursault's eventual murder of an Arab man on the beach. The murder is completely unprovoked and seems to happen almost by accident, with Meursault later stating that he killed the man because he was "too close" and the sun was in his eyes. The absurdity of this act is further highlighted by the fact that Meursault seems to have no remorse or guilt over the murder, and instead focuses on the practicalities of his impending trial.
In addition to absurdity, The Stranger also explores themes of nihilism and the human condition. Meursault's detachment from emotions and his lack of concern for the consequences of his actions can be seen as a form of nihilism, as he seems to lack any sense of purpose or meaning in life. This is further reflected in his statement that "nothing really mattered" and his belief that life is ultimately meaningless.
Overall, The Stranger is a powerful example of absurdist literature that explores themes of absurdity, nihilism, and the human condition. Through the character of Meursault, Camus presents a thought-provoking critique of modern society and the human experience.
Judicial Creativity Essay Plan (Concepts of Law)
Let us explore these arguments in more detail. . In the area of statute law at least, judicial creativity can be regarded as the exception rather than the rule. If a defendant commits an act which is not considered criminal, but the judge then decides that it is, therefore changing the law, this would be considered unfair for the defendant. However, the modern doctrine of precedence can be seen to have departed considerably from this position, especially with the advent of the Practice Settlement 1966, which contra to London tramways, allowed Lords to depart from its previous decisions.
Judicial Creativity
Legal precedent is extremely beneficial to our Criminal justice system and our court system because it allows consistency, reliability and predictability within our decisions. I will talk about the advantages and disadvantages that contribute to the doctrine of binding precedent including examples of previous cases. The London Tramways decision supported this view of precedent by binding the House of Lords to its previous decisions and affirming the idea of stare decisis within the common law. Judges look at a previous case, which is similar and in an equal or higher court and they will then use this information to decide… Judicial Branch Essay The Constitution does indeed provide a system of separation of powers and checks and balances. With this being said, all separated powers are completely and totally equal, all three of them. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES A bicameral is two chambers; the Senate and the House of Representatives. The court had to decide which of two precedents these facts were analogous to theft from a train or hotel.
This can be observed in Adams v New Jersey Steamship where a claimant sought compensation after a theft in his room rented on a steamship. Discuss whether judges should be able to develop the law 30 marks+5marks for AO3 A French philosopher, Montesquieu, introduced the separation of powers theory in the 18th century. The court has the right to choose its cases, but these are brought before them not sought after by the court. They must follow precedent of higher court judges. They would suggest that the judges had posited new law, derived not from morality, but social norms. Judges should rule on precedents, however, sometimes a court will depart from the rule of precedent if it decides that the precedent should no longer be followed. For Premium Problem solving Creativity Creativity at Work For a lot of people it can be a bit difficult to remain creative at work.
Change in the law, which could lead to uncertainty. The London Tramways decision supported this view of precedent by binding the House of Lords to its previous decisions and affirming the idea of stare decisis within the common law. Moreover, the Doctrine of precedent consists of binding precedent and persuasive precedent. Judges cannot invent laws out of whole cloth; they must be able to provide clear legal rationales for their decisions, with supporting information in the form of decisions in single cases. For judges to make law, their approach to an area must seek a result which is in some way incongruous with the result prescribed by prior sources of law. . Previously judges made decisions solely on what they believed, without mentioning existing cases.
