IPC 182 is a section of the Indian Penal Code that deals with the offense of false information, with intent to cause public mischief. This offense is punishable under Indian law and can carry serious consequences for those found guilty.
Under IPC 182, it is illegal to intentionally give false information to a public servant, with the intention of causing public mischief. Public mischief refers to an act that is intended to cause harm to the public or to disturb the public peace. This could include spreading false rumors or lies about a person or event, with the intent to cause harm or unrest.
In order to be found guilty of this offense, the prosecution must prove that the accused gave false information to a public servant with the intent to cause public mischief. The accused must have had the intention to cause harm or unrest, and must have known that the information they were providing was false.
The punishment for this offense depends on the severity of the harm caused and the intent of the accused. In cases where the false information caused serious harm or unrest, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to six months or a fine, or both. In cases where the false information caused minor harm or unrest, the accused may be sentenced to imprisonment for up to one month or a fine, or both.
It is important to note that IPC 182 only applies to false information given to a public servant, and not to false information given to the general public. However, spreading false information to the public can still be considered a criminal offense under other sections of the Indian Penal Code, such as IPC 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) or IPC 505 (statements conducing to public mischief).
In conclusion, IPC 182 is a significant section of the Indian Penal Code that criminalizes the act of giving false information to a public servant with the intention of causing public mischief. This offense carries serious consequences and is punishable under Indian law. It is important for individuals to be aware of this offense and to refrain from spreading false information that could cause harm or unrest to the public.
IPC 182
State of Punjab, and set aside a high court judgment, which had directed the Registrar General to make a formal complaint for prosecution under Section 182 of the Indian Penal Code. A bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice AM Sapre observed that such a position is settled in the case of Daulat Ram vs. . The Patna High Court has held that where certain members of a political party passed resolutions criticising the administration and the public about their inaction and lack of sense of duty with respect to certain happenings, and copies of the resolutions were sent to different officers and people, section 182 of the Code did not apply. Illustrations a A informs a Magistrate that Z, a police-officer, subordinate to such Magistrate, has been guilty of neglect of duty or misconduct, knowing such information to be false, and knowing it to be likely that the information will cause the Magistrate to dismiss Z. A has committed an offence under this section. According to this section, whoever gives to any public servant any information either with the knowledge that it is false, or which he believes to be false, with the intention thereby to cause, or with the knowledge that it is likely that he will thereby cause, such public servant, a either to do or omit anything which such public servant ought not to do or omit if he would have had knowledge about the true state of facts, or b to make use of the lawful power of such public servant to cause either injury or annoyance to any person, shall be punished with simple or rigorous imprisonment for a term extending up to six months, or with fine extending up to one thousand rupees, or with both.
The offence under this section is non-cognizable, bailable and non-compoundable, and is triable by any magistrate. He does not mention the name of any person as one of his assailants, but knows it to be likely that in consequence of this information the police will make enquiries and institute searches in the village to the annoyance of the villagers or some of them. The Supreme Court, in Saloni Arora vs. The section is intended to ensure that public servants are not misled in the performance of their duties. Article shared by Legal Provisions of Section 182 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. A has committed the offence defined in this section.
Prosecution For Offence Under Sec. 182 IPC Without Formal Complaint By Public Servant Void Ab Initio: SC [Read Judgment]
A bench comprising Justice AK Sikri and Justice AM Sapre observed that such a position is settled in the case of Daulat. False information with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person: Giving false information to a public servant with the intention of causing the public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person, has been made an offence under this section. He does not mention the name of any person as one of his assailants, but knows it to be likely that in consequence of this information the police will make enquiries and institute searches in the village to the annoyance of the villagers or some of them. State, has reiterated that in order to prosecute an accused for an offence punishable under Section 182 IPC, it is mandatory to follow the procedure prescribed under Section 195 of the Code else such action is rendered void ab initio. In Daulat Ram case, the apex court had held that the complaint must be in writing by the public servant concerned, and without that, trial for the offence under Section 182 IPC is without jurisdiction ab initio.
Similarly, absence of knowledge or belief of the falsity of the information would mean non-applicability of the section. A has committed the offence defined in this section. IPC 182 Section тАФ False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person Indian Penal Code IPC 182 Section Whoever gives to any public servant any information which he knows or believes to be false, intending thereby to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, such public servantтАФ a to do or omit anything which such public servant ought not to do or omit if the true state of facts respecting which such information is given were known by him, or b to use the lawful power of such public servant to the injury or annoyance of any person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. рд╕рд╛рд░реЗ рдЕрдзрд┐рдХрд╛рд░ рд░рд┐рдЬрд░реНрд╡реНрдбред 0. рд╣рдорд╛рд░реА рд░рд┐рдлрдВрдб рдФрд░ рдХреИрдВрд╕рд▓реЗрд╢рди рдкрд╛рд▓рд┐рд╕реА рджреЗрдЦреЗ LawRato.
A has committed the offence defined in this section. . A has committed the offence defined in this section. Read the Judgment here. The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that where a sessions judge rightly acquitted an alleged assailant because though the person lodging the first information report had named him therein he refused to identify him in the court, the sessions judge was not competent to initiate later on proceedings under section 182 of the Code against the person lodging the first information report because the investigating machinery was set in motion by a message received by telephone and also because the first information report was made not to the sub-divisional magistrate but to the police. Hi my wife complaint to sp that I try to kidnep her and same day file tranfer case to high Court from my city to her city. .
IPC Section 182: False Information, With Intent To Cause Public Servant To Use His Lawful Power To The Injury Of Another Person
Definition of IPC 182: False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person. Illustrations a A informs a Magistrate that Z, a police-officer, subordinate to such Magistrate, has been guilty of neglect of duty or misconduct, knowing such information to be false, and knowing it to be likely that the information will cause the Magistrate to dismiss Z. . This article has been made possible because of financial support from. Section 195 of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with procedure for prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.
My question is that can I file a defamation case against my wife or any other criminal caze 343 votes I am sorry to hear that you had to go through all this. The Gujarat High Court is of the opinion ADVERTISEMENTS: Cases The Allahabad High Court refused to convict an accused under this section who had made a false report of a robbery having been committed in his house with a view to suppress certain documents by showing them as having been stolen in the course of that robbery. A has committed an offence under this section. I was also met sp of police that matrimonial cases is going on between the party and I am ready to cooperate with police whenever Cal me but there is no Cal received by me from police. ADVERTISEMENTS: The information given to the public servant must be with knowledge of its falsity or with belief that it is false, and the giver of the information must either have intention to cause the public servant, or knowledge that it is likely that he would cause the public servant, to do or omit what has been stated in clause a or clause b of the section.
