Four sources of arguable issues. What is an arguable issue on appeal? 2023-01-04
Four sources of arguable issues Rating:
7,9/10
690
reviews
An arguable issue is a topic or idea that is open to debate and can be disputed by different individuals or groups. There are many sources of arguable issues, and these can often be the source of conflicts and controversies in society.
One source of arguable issues is cultural and societal values. Different cultures and societies often have different values and beliefs about what is important and what is acceptable behavior. For example, some cultures may place a high value on individual freedom and self-expression, while others may prioritize community harmony and group conformity. These differing values can lead to conflicts and debates about issues such as censorship, freedom of speech, and social norms.
Another source of arguable issues is politics and government policies. Political parties and governments often have different ideologies and agendas, and this can lead to disputes and debates about issues such as taxation, healthcare, and foreign policy. Political issues can also be influenced by the media, which can shape public opinion and contribute to the formation of arguable issues.
A third source of arguable issues is religion and spirituality. Different religions and spiritual beliefs often have different teachings and practices, and this can lead to conflicts and debates about issues such as abortion, marriage, and the role of religion in society.
Finally, arguable issues can also arise from scientific and technological developments. For example, advances in genetic engineering and artificial intelligence have raised ethical questions about the consequences and potential risks of these technologies. Similarly, debates about climate change and the use of fossil fuels have emerged as significant arguable issues in recent years.
In conclusion, there are many sources of arguable issues in society, including cultural and societal values, politics and government policies, religion and spirituality, and scientific and technological developments. These issues can lead to conflicts and controversies, but they can also inspire important discussions and debates that help shape our understanding of the world and our place in it.
Your Course Guide
Evidence comes in different sorts, and it tends to vary from one academic field or subject of argument to another. Court-appointed criminal appellate attorneys face a different challenge. Prompt Now that you have spent some time writing down some potential issues for your project, it is time to narrow the focus. Evidence serves as support for the reasons offered and helps compel audiences to accept claims. Get started right away! This database covers Sciences, Economics, Criminal Justice, Environmental Science, History, Marketing, Political Science and Psychology. When such outcome of carrying is forced on a woman, it is her right to make such an intimate decision, which only involves her body.
Identify two arguable sides about your second issue related to your career or degree field. Identify the argument in each image and start learning how to analyze an issue by applying the evaluative questions listed underneath the images. Both of these ideas are excellent, but I could actually see the second one folded into the first quite easily. Logical argument, whether in visual or verbal form, is intended to persuade through solid evidence, as opposed to emotion or visual or verbal bias or manipulation. Though a complete analysis always needs to use these elements, the reasons for engaging in it may vary widely. This acronym provides a way not only to remember the four components but also to visualize them working together.
Identify why your topic would be meaningful to your audience people connected to your career or degree field. Individual Databases Learn how toexplore individual academic databases that are relevant to the assignment. Therefore, abortion should be accepted as a legal practice in medicine. Specifically, you must also address the following rubric criteria: Choose a side that you might argue. But whether the goal is to persuade, explore, or enlighten, analysis should always spring from a careful examination of a given subject.
Claims that presuppose value systems, morals, or religious beliefs cannot be supported with evidence and therefore are not argumentative theses. New York: McGraw Hill. If you were developing an essay about the topic of either of the images, what issue would you choose and what would your own argument be? Rather, it must have a reasonable potential for success. City council members should be term limited to prevent one group or party from maintaining control indefinitely is an arguable thesis because term limits are possible, and shared political control is a reasonable goal. If a brief includes a laundry list of errors, numbering over five, the Court of Appeal may wonder whether so many errors could be committed in one hearing. If you go in that direction, see if you can compose a solid research question that will help you to guide your inquiries.
Identify two arguable sides about your first issue related to your career or degree field.
Identify two arguable sides about your second issue related to your career or degree field The first issue that I will discuss that is related to my degree field is how secure or private cloud storage data is. Such cases include rape, poverty, teenage pregnancy and others. There are simply too many cases of when forced carriage of the baby lead to negative consequences, on the mother as well as on the baby whose right is claimed to be protected. If a speaker is arguing about toxic waste dumps, a quotation from someone living next to a dump would fall into this category. The purpose of an analysis is not necessarily to convince a reader that your point of view is correct, but rather to reveal that you have thought about your subject thoroughly and arrived at reasonable and significant considerations. What do they do if they cannot find an arguable issue on appeal? Reasonable people could agree or disagree with the statement. As Justice Gardner noted in People v.
Eyewitness or first-hand testimonies are reports from people who directly experience some phenomenon. The rationality for abortion to be a legal practice can be based on the outcomes of an opposite situation, for example, abortion deemed illegal. By giving them access you can store as much of your information in the cloud as much as you want because in my field, I will have to upload people information to the cloud or install security measures to protect your information. My guess is that some additional clarity will be forthcoming as you move through the work this week. Argumentation is a social process of two or more people making arguments, responding to one another--not simply restating the same claims and reasons--and modifying or defending their positions accordingly. Each can be an effective mode of building support for a reason or claim. Arguable Issue Medical topics, specifically concerning issues that involve life and death decisions, are often viewed controversially in the society.
One of the tasks of an appellate attorney is to select the issues on appeal. Evidence Based An argumentative thesis must be able to be supported by evidence. Example City council members stink and should be thrown in jail is not an argumentative thesis. Federal immigration enforcement law needs to be overhauled because it puts undue constraints on state and local police is an argumentative thesis because it asserts a position that immigration enforcement law needs to be changed. Wende 1979 25 Cal. California 1967 386 U.
Example Federal immigration law is a tough issue about which many people disagree is not an arguable thesis because it does not assert a position. Selecting three or four grounds for appeal is best. With an example as evidence, someone arguing against seat belt use might say "Last year my cousin crashed her car off a bridge and would have drowned if she were wearing her seatbelt" as evidence the answer to "Why do you believe that? Abortion and human rights. A focused, narrow claim is clearer, more able to be supported with evidence, and more persuasive than a broad, general claim. That ripple effect has some dire consequences on the downstream side of the supply chain. Planned obsolescence is a function of having a consumer culture as opposed to having one that values craftsmanship and quality. The latter conflict calls too many political debates, protests, and even to cases of murder, for example, George Tiller, George Tiller, a famous abortion doctor who was murdered by an anti-abortion activist Tumulty, 2009.
