It is a highly controversial and complex issue whether every country should have nuclear weapons. While some argue that having nuclear weapons can serve as a deterrent and provide security, others believe that the proliferation of nuclear weapons can lead to serious consequences and increase the risk of global conflict.
One argument in favor of every country having nuclear weapons is that it can serve as a deterrent against aggression. The theory of mutually assured destruction (MAD) suggests that the possession of nuclear weapons by multiple countries can prevent major wars because the consequences of a nuclear conflict would be catastrophic for all sides. In this view, having nuclear weapons can deter potential adversaries from attacking or invading a country because they know that the country has the means to defend itself with nuclear weapons.
However, there are also several drawbacks to this argument. First, the proliferation of nuclear weapons can increase the risk of accidental or unintended use. If more countries have nuclear weapons, there is a greater chance that one of these weapons could be used by mistake or through miscommunication. This could lead to catastrophic consequences, as a nuclear conflict would not only affect the countries directly involved, but could also have devastating impacts on the rest of the world.
Another argument against every country having nuclear weapons is that it can lead to an arms race, as countries may feel the need to constantly increase the size and capabilities of their nuclear arsenals in order to maintain a balance of power. This arms race can be costly and divert resources away from other important domestic needs. It can also lead to an increase in tensions between countries, as they may perceive each other as threats and become more aggressive in their foreign policies.
In addition, the proliferation of nuclear weapons can contribute to the destabilization of international relations. If more countries have nuclear weapons, it may be more difficult to resolve conflicts peacefully, as the threat of nuclear escalation could be used to intimidate other countries. This can lead to an increased risk of global conflict and make it harder to achieve international cooperation on important issues such as climate change, global health crises, and economic instability.
Overall, while the possession of nuclear weapons may provide some sense of security and deterrence, the potential risks and drawbacks of every country having nuclear weapons are significant. The international community must carefully consider the consequences of proliferation and work towards disarmament and non-proliferation efforts in order to promote global peace and stability.