Ends ways and means. Rethinking Strategy: A History of the Ends, Ways Means Model 2022-12-28
Ends ways and means Rating:
The ends, ways, and means framework is a concept often used in the field of ethics and political science to analyze the morality of a particular action or policy. The framework consists of three elements: the ends, the ways, and the means.
The ends refer to the desired outcome or goal of an action or policy. This could be something as broad as achieving world peace or as specific as passing a particular legislation. The ends serve as the motivation for the action or policy, and they should be considered carefully before proceeding.
The ways refer to the methods or strategies used to achieve the desired ends. These methods should be chosen carefully, as they can have significant consequences. For example, if the end is to achieve world peace, one way to do so might be through diplomacy and negotiation. However, another way might be through military force. While both methods may ultimately lead to the same end, the means used to achieve that end can have very different consequences.
The means refer to the resources and actions taken to implement the chosen ways. These resources might include financial resources, human resources, or physical resources. The means should be chosen with care, as they can also have significant consequences. For example, if the chosen way to achieve world peace is through diplomacy, the means might include funding for diplomatic efforts, hiring trained diplomats, and building diplomatic facilities.
When considering the morality of a particular action or policy, it is important to consider all three elements of the ends, ways, and means framework. The ends should be noble and justifiable, the ways should be chosen carefully to minimize negative consequences, and the means should be chosen with an eye towards efficiency and effectiveness. By considering all three elements, we can ensure that our actions and policies are ethical and aligned with our values.
Ends, Ways, and Means without Geostrategic Context is a Crapshoot • The Havok Journal
If you lose a game, think about the plan that you used and how it played out. Posen defines grand strategy as "a state's theory about how it can best 'cause' security for itself. Downsizing or rightsizing, the third approach attempts to do more with less focusing only on means. So, go ahead, use ends, ways and means to identify your needs in the game and aim to win systematically. In general a 3 player. It can change the balance of power, who controls what, and so on.
Lykke's model purposely highlights the connection between ends and means because his approach to strategy was highly influenced by the perception that Vietnam-era strategists overextended the United States by not aligning goals with resources. A second approach to changing the U. Jack Kem in Military Transformation, Ends Ways and Means, discusses three approaches. Now, and in the future, we "will have to seek creative and relevant solutions with fewer resources. First, defining strategy as a theory of success requires us to make a claim about how our proposed actions will actually cause success to happen.
Political science research suggests people will not discard a policy idea unless there is a plausible alternative. If this relationship is vague, the entire campaign is seriously flawed and you might be at risk. As noted above, this is the core problem with Lykke's definition of strategy. The direction of the strategy is by its nature rather proactive, in that is seeks to control the environment rather than reacting to it. Business school professor Richard P. A key principle of the Lykke model is to work with the resources or power that you currently have; however, more nuanced thinking about power suggests power is not a set value and instead is determined by the strategy.
This is the stuff of "PowerPoint nirvana" but encourages strategists to avoid thinking creatively and precisely about resources and power. Rumelt defines strategy as "a coherent set of analyses, concepts, policies, arguments, and actions that respond to a high-stakes challenge. The other services are not quite so bold. Once the context is determined, ends, ways and means can be applied in shaping the U. .
Rethinking Strategy: A History of the Ends, Ways Means Model
Third, his questionable use of quotations from strategists particularly use of speech from Maxwell Taylor. Step three: List the means required to enable and execute the ways. The two definitions that come closest to articulating a distinctive meaning for strategy are offered by Barry Posen and Eliot Cohen. Yes, in two main ways. Far too often strategy is an exercise in means-based planning; it is inherently uncreative, noncritical, and limits new and adaptive thinking. .
While the government of Afghanistan seems somewhat stable, Afghan National Security Forces have barely been able to stem the tide even with ever-increasing American assistance. The costs and benefits of one strategy will be different than the costs and benefits of other strategies. The other initiatives or actions to be added to the basic counterterrorism approach were never exactly clear. A third major problem with definitions of strategy is the propensity to describe good strategy or to list the things that strategy should do rather than to actually define what strategy is. Does the new definition of strategy improve upon the Lykke model? The thought process will obviously require careful consideration, but the concept of ends, means and ways is proven and should be considered when devising a strategy. But, starting with the notion of seven and only seven forms of national power and all of them should always be utilized to implement a whole-of-government solution is infantile.
Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy by Jeffrey W. Meiser :: SSRN
The problems with our current understanding of strategy are exacerbated by the whole-of-government approach encouraging us to define national power as a discrete set of instruments that form a convenient acronym. I can't count how many times I have played the game of Risk and done something I later regretted either in that game or in a later game. If you are playing with the dealt cards setup, then you should generally go for which. Doctrine becomes the center for how the Army thinks and fights. Rethinking Strategy How can we do better? There are significant costs, however, to highlighting the means and the ends while sidelining the ways.
The Army was existing under the shadow of Vietnam and the transformation of the Army, especially doctrine, including Active Defense and AirLand Battle. A strategic outcome will have a profound effect on your circumstances. Dempsey, "Joint Education" white paper, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, July 16,2012 , 4-5. Rethinking the Ends, Ways, Means model is vital due to the overall importance of doctrine and the potential impact it has and overall, we are currently in a different world from the 1980s. Transfer your strategic objective to other places.