A jury of peers summary. A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell 2023-01-04

A jury of peers summary Rating: 5,4/10 1315 reviews

A jury of peers is a fundamental principle of the criminal justice system in many countries, including the United States. It is the idea that individuals accused of a crime should be tried by a group of their peers, rather than a single judge or other authority figure. This principle is based on the belief that ordinary citizens are best equipped to judge the actions of their fellow citizens, as they can relate to and understand the context and circumstances in which the alleged crime was committed.

The concept of a jury of peers can be traced back to ancient Greece and Rome, where citizens were called upon to serve as jurors in legal proceedings. In modern times, the principle has been codified in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to a trial by an impartial jury. This means that the jury must be made up of individuals who are representative of the community in which the crime was committed, and who have no personal stake in the outcome of the trial.

There are several key benefits to the principle of a jury of peers. First, it helps to ensure that the accused receives a fair and impartial trial. By relying on a group of ordinary citizens to decide the case, rather than a single judge or other authority figure, the risk of bias or corruption is greatly reduced. This helps to protect the rights of the accused and ensure that justice is served.

Second, a jury of peers helps to increase public trust in the criminal justice system. When ordinary citizens serve as jurors, it demonstrates that the system is truly democratic and accountable to the people. It also helps to foster a sense of shared responsibility and civic engagement, as jurors are called upon to perform an important public service.

Finally, a jury of peers helps to ensure that the law is applied fairly and consistently across different cases and communities. By relying on ordinary citizens to interpret and apply the law, rather than a single authority figure, the risk of discrimination or inconsistency is reduced. This helps to promote the rule of law and maintain public confidence in the justice system.

Overall, the principle of a jury of peers is an important part of the criminal justice system. It helps to ensure that accused individuals receive a fair and impartial trial, increases public trust in the system, and promotes the fair and consistent application of the law.

A Jury of Her Peers

a jury of peers summary

She looks back at the sugar bag; things were clearly begun but not finished. Wright's suffering when the only living thing around her has died. She is examining the birdcage and says that the door is broken; it seems like someone roughly pulled the hinge off. Hale grabs a chair and stands on it to look at the cupboard, murmuring that it would be a shame if all the fruit were all gone. Peters is amazed and amused that Minnie could worry about her domestic projects in the face of her serious situation. Hale reflects that she has never set foot in the farmhouse, but wishes she had called on the inhabitants: John Wright and Minnie Wright.

Next

Glaspell's A Jury of Her Peers: Summary & Analysis

a jury of peers summary

Vincent Millay Pulitzer Prize for Poetry 1923 and Theodore Dreiser An American Tragedy 1925. He was the first person to hear of Mr. Wright to strangle her husband in a similar manner. She says Minnie would feel bad if she knew all her work was gone, and she remembers her own cherries. The women notice the little details that A Jury Of Her Peers Summary action comes into play. Anything that the women take notice of is considered to be of little importance. Wright, who was strangled to death in his sleep as his wife allegedly slept by his side.


Next

A Jury Of Her Peers Summary

a jury of peers summary

Instead, the women conduct their trial in the kitchen while the men search fruitlessly for clues. . . Hale continues with his tale, explaining that he went to get a neighbor named Harry, and the two of them went upstairs and found John dead. However, when he explained that he had come over to their house to propose sharing a party line telephone, Minnie suddenly laughed, abruptly stopped, and looked sacred of Mr. The women cannot help but notice the similarity between the bird's death and Mr. The location of the farm in the hollow contributes to the feeling of isolation.

Next

A Jury of Her Peers Beginning to “They were soon back—” Summary and Analysis

a jury of peers summary

Peters reacts to finding the dead bird on an emotional and personal level. With this focus on the necessity of women sticking together, Glaspell highlights the importance of empathy. Hale suggests the cat got it, but Mrs. Peters seems less irritated by the mens' ill treatment, but in the end, she seems to have been won over to Mrs. Hale remembers how her own kitchen looked when she was interrupted and starts to see that Minnie must have also been interrupted. Peters laughs a bit and says it is funny to think of one here, but there must have been—why would there be a cage? Hale disparages them saying, "But would the women know a clue if they did come upon it? Since gender roles are a central theme of this story, setting the action in the kitchen helps pull us into the female characters' world. If you have questions about this or any specific case, consider retaining the services of an experienced Can I Solve This on My Own or Do I Need an Attorney? He has been strangled to death.

Next

A Jury of Her Peers Summary & Analysis

a jury of peers summary

Peters tells her that they should not be meddling with it, but Mrs. Hale has now worked on the quilt, it has been patchworked. Peters mirror the power differences between the characters: Mr. The bird brought a lightness back into her life. The story begins on a cold, windy day in fictional Dickson County, with Martha Hale being abruptly called to ride to the scene of Wright's murder. Peters well, but she reflects that Mrs. It is a short story about two women finding the solution to a crime that the men were unable to.

Next

A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell

a jury of peers summary

Wright because she knows that she led a lonely life with her cold husband. After the men leave, Mrs. Hale begins narrating the story nervously, saying that he and his oldest son, Harry, were here on the last day, in order to pursue Wright to install a telephone. She looks to the sewing basket for patches and her things. Her behavior seems to reflect that of a woman in a traumatic aftershock, not completely in tune with her surroundings and reality. This isolation is not the only important point to be made about the setting, however.

Next

A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell Plot Summary

a jury of peers summary

Inside, she finds a jar of cherries that is all right. Hale Summary Of Household Women In A Jury Of Her Peers they try to free themselves out of the prison life they are in. Hale can recount the sequence of events that he experienced the day before at the Wrights' house. Peters to gather some things for Minnie. Lesson Summary "A Jury of Her Peers" is a short story by Susan Glaspell that was published in 1917. Peters changes his tone to make it seem like it is time for official business, asking Mr. Minnie Wright lived a lonely life that would have been changed had her husband chosen to install a telephone.

Next

A jury of Her Peers typemoon.org

a jury of peers summary

Because they are able to empathize with Minnie, these women turn out to be the ''peers'' best fit to judge whether Minnie's crime was justified. Wright has allegedly been strangled. Because neither John nor Minnie appear directly in the story, their past relationship has been described by other characters and by the physical details of their home. As the men go, the women appear to be more at ease, cleaning and arranging the disheveled place. The quilt is seen as a womanly pastime, which the men see as ridiculous in the face of the more important, male-dominated legal investigation.

Next

What Is a Jury of Peers?

a jury of peers summary

Peters is the sheriff. In practice, however, potential jurors often are removed for what appears to be their gender or race, even though the removal is for other stated reasons or for no particular reason at all. Peters says, "I know what stillness is. The men hear them discussing the quilt and laugh at their foolishness for caring about something so trivial. The party includes: the county attorney, George Henderson, the local sheriff, Henry Peters, his wife, Mrs.

Next